Linked Life Data

16246393

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16246393

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1-2
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-12-12
pubmed:abstractText
We tested the effect of visual distractors presented monocularly and binocularly on saccade latency and accuracy to determine whether differences occur in saccadic planning with binocular or monocular visual input. For five participants with normal binocular single vision (BSV), saccade latency and accuracy were compared with distractors presented to the dominant eye, non-dominant eye or to both eyes. Eye movements of the dominant eye were recorded using a Skalar infra-red recorder. In the presence of normal BSV, the effect of distractors is significantly larger for saccade latency and accuracy with binocular distractor presentation than for monocular presentations, with no difference between distrators presented to the dominant or non-dominant eye. The implications of these results are discussed with regard to saccade programming.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0042-6989
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
46
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
72-81
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
The effect of binocular and monocular distractors on saccades in participants with normal binocular vision.
pubmed:affiliation
Academic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, UK. h.griffiths@sheffield.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article