Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1619458rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007868lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1619458lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449416lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1619458lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441800lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1619458lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0919553lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1619458lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021713lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:dateCreated1992-8-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:abstractTextThe present study aimed to assess where the interobserver variation in grading cervical dysplasia stems from. Four experienced pathologists examined 93 histological slides, after they agreed on which morphological characteristics should be considered relevant for grading. They scored 6 morphological characteristics for each slide and assigned it to a degree of dysplasia. Compared to a previous study, the interobserver variation showed a statistically significant improvement: the weighted group kappa value increased from 0.55 to 0.69. For the scores of the individual characteristics considerable interobserver variation was observed: weighted group kappa values ranged from 0.28 to 0.49. The pathologists slightly differed in which characteristics they considered most important for their grading. The agreement on the degree of dysplasia turned out to be better than the agreement on the morphological characteristics on which this diagnosis is based. In the discussion, a few explanations for this paradoxical finding are put forward.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:issn0895-4356lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KoudstaalJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchoutenH JHJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KweeW SWSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SturmansFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KnipschildP...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ArendsJ WJWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WillebrandDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:authorpubmed-author:de VetH CHClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:volume45lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:pagination785-90lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:dateRevised2005-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1619458-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1619458-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1619458-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1619458-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1619458-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1619458-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:year1992lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:articleTitleSources of interobserver variation in histopathological grading of cervical dysplasia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Limburg, Maastrict, The Netherlands.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1619458pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed