Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
Pt 1
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-9-13
pubmed:abstractText
Evaluation of terminological systems has been demonstrated to be a complicated task. This is due to the broad range of terminological systems, their application, and the clinical contexts in which they can be applied. We propose an evaluation framework that explicitly distinguishes an application-independent description of terminological systems, methods to determine application-dependent requirements, and methods to assess the applicability. In order to support a systematic application-independent description of terminological systems, we present a categorization of characteristics, including explicit questions. The answers to these questions can be mapped to the requirements for a certain application of a terminological system. This framework aims at reducing the efforts for determining which terminological system is applicable for a certain clinical setting.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0926-9630
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
107
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
497-501
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-7-10
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2004
pubmed:articleTitle
Overcoming barriers to evaluation of terminological systems.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.cornet@amc.uva.nl
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't