Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-1-5
pubmed:abstractText
It is well known that an allele causing increased recombination is expected to proliferate as a result of genetic drift in a finite population undergoing selection, without requiring other mechanisms. This is supported by recent simulations apparently demonstrating that, in small populations, drift is more important than epistasis in increasing recombination, with this effect disappearing in larger finite populations. However, recent experimental evidence finds a greater advantage for recombination in larger populations. These results are reconciled by demonstrating through simulation without epistasis that for m loci recombination has an appreciable selective advantage over a range of population sizes (am, bm). bm increases steadily with m while am remains fairly static. Thus, however large the finite population, if selection acts on sufficiently many loci, an allele that increases recombination is selected for. We show that as selection acts on our finite population, recombination increases the variance in expected log fitness, causing indirect selection on a recombination-modifying locus. This effect is enhanced in those populations with more loci because the variance in phenotypic fitnesses in relation to the possible range will be smaller. Thus fixation of a particular haplotype is less likely to occur, increasing the advantage of recombination.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-1011844, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-10978305, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-11761054, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-11967549, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-12478292, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-1269919, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-16592864, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-17246615, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-3692141, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-4448362, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-5527627, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-5861564, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-5980116, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-7605514, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-8119830, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-9335621, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/14704200-971808
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0016-6731
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
165
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
2249-58
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
Recombination can evolve in large finite populations given selection on sufficient loci.
pubmed:affiliation
Mathematical Modelling and Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Genomic Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2JF, United Kingdom. m.m.iles@shef.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study