rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2003-11-27
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The purpose of this study was to compare midazolam alone (Group A: 1 mg/kg) vs midazolam plus meperidine (Group B: 0.5 and 1 mg/kg, respectively) in regard to physiology and behavior of young children sedated for dental restorative care.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
D
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0164-1263
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
25
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
468-74
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-6-2
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Administration, Oral,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Analgesics, Opioid,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Analysis of Variance,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Anesthetics, Inhalation,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Blood Pressure,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Chi-Square Distribution,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Child, Preschool,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Child Behavior,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Cross-Over Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Crying,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Dental Anxiety,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Dental Restoration, Permanent,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Drug Combinations,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Heart Rate,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Hypnotics and Sedatives,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Meperidine,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Midazolam,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Movement,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Nitrous Oxide,
pubmed-meshheading:14649610-Prospective Studies
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of the efficacy of oral midazolam alone versus midazolam and meperidine in the pediatric dental patient.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
United States Air Force, Lakenheath, England.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|