Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-8-7
pubmed:abstractText
Three PCR techniques (amplification of the psaA, ply, and lytA genes) and a commercial kit (AccuProbe [GenProbe, San Diego, Calif.], based on hybridization with the 16S rRNA gene), all four of which claimed to be specific for Streptococcus pneumoniae, were used to identify 49 alpha-hemolytic streptococcal isolates suspected of being pneumococci. The definite phenotypic identification of these organisms as S. pneumoniae was difficult when optochin susceptibility and the presence of a capsule were taken as markers. Furthermore, RsaI digestion of the amplified 16S rRNA gene was applied. All 49 strains were optochin resistant. Eleven of these were encapsulated and were identified as pneumococci by all tests. Twenty of the 38 unencapsulated strains were unambiguously identified as nonpneumococci by all tests. The identities of another 18 unencapsulated strains remained inconclusive due to highly variable reactions for all phenotypic and genotypic techniques applied. The AccuProbe test was positive for seven strains for which the results of the other tests were inconclusive. RsaI restriction of the amplified 16S rRNA gene confirmed the AccuProbe result for all strains, while the result of the psaA-specific PCR was in concordance with encapsulation for all strains. The results presented here indicate that identification problems continue to exist for some strains, despite the application of genotypic and phenotypic tests in combination. We found the psaA-specific PCR to be the genotypic technique best suited for the identification of genuine pneumococci and optochin-resistant pneumococci.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-10379688, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-10515740, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-10517614, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-10618136, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-10678950, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-11318815, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-11474432, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-11526140, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-11526182, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-11527799, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-11574554, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-12031582, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-12069896, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-1355082, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-1357000, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-1400974, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-14971, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-2331852, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-2387292, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-2563386, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-3665898, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-3745478, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-6436221, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-7256087, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-7844395, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-7852553, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-7914205, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-7934882, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-8253962, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-9426518, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-9458976, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12904349-9986825
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0095-1137
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
41
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
3521-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of five genotypic techniques for identification of optochin-resistant pneumococcus-like isolates.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium. Rita.Verhelst@ugent
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study