Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12843044rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332307lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12843044lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023238lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12843044lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1511790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12843044lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12843044lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014441lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12843044lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0079603lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12843044lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680536lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:dateCreated2003-7-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:abstractTextMembers of the genus Legionella are characterized as gram-negative, motile, freshwater-dwelling bacteria that were responsible for a pneumonia outbreak among American Legion members in 1976. Because clinicians routinely order serologic testing for Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1 to 6 as a screen for possible L. pneumophila infections, we evaluated the Wampole Laboratories L. pneumophila type 1 to 6 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM combined enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the Zeus Scientific L. pneumophila type 1 to 6 IgG-IgM-IgA multispecific combined ELISA systems and compared them to an IgG-specific immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for L. pneumophila serogroups 1 to 6. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that the positive titer cutoff for an IFA be 1:256. Regardless of where the positive IFA cutoff titer is placed, however, the sensitivity of both commercial assays was below what would be acceptable for a screening assay. With a 1:256 IFA titer as the positive cutoff, the agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the Wampole ELISA were 74.6, 21.4, and 98.4%, respectively. The agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the Zeus ELISA were 72.6, 10.5, and 100.0%, respectively. We recommend that any laboratories attempting to replace an IFA type 1 to 6 screen with an alternative ELISA carefully investigate the sensitivity of the replacement assay.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:issn0095-1137lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MartinsThomas...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LitwinChristi...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HillHarry RHRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JaskowskiTroy...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MalanAnnette...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:volume41lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:pagination3060-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12843044...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12843044...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12843044...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12843044...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12843044...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12843044...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12843044...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12843044...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12843044...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12843044...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:year2003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:articleTitleComparison of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with an immunofluorescence assay for detection of Legionella pneumophila types 1 to 6.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:affiliationAssociated Regional and University Pathologists Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA. malanak@aruplab.comlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12843044pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:12843044lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:12843044lld:pubmed