Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12843044
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
7
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2003-7-4
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Members of the genus Legionella are characterized as gram-negative, motile, freshwater-dwelling bacteria that were responsible for a pneumonia outbreak among American Legion members in 1976. Because clinicians routinely order serologic testing for Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1 to 6 as a screen for possible L. pneumophila infections, we evaluated the Wampole Laboratories L. pneumophila type 1 to 6 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM combined enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the Zeus Scientific L. pneumophila type 1 to 6 IgG-IgM-IgA multispecific combined ELISA systems and compared them to an IgG-specific immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for L. pneumophila serogroups 1 to 6. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that the positive titer cutoff for an IFA be 1:256. Regardless of where the positive IFA cutoff titer is placed, however, the sensitivity of both commercial assays was below what would be acceptable for a screening assay. With a 1:256 IFA titer as the positive cutoff, the agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the Wampole ELISA were 74.6, 21.4, and 98.4%, respectively. The agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the Zeus ELISA were 72.6, 10.5, and 100.0%, respectively. We recommend that any laboratories attempting to replace an IFA type 1 to 6 screen with an alternative ELISA carefully investigate the sensitivity of the replacement assay.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12843044-12097254,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12843044-2851580,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12843044-335244,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12843044-434627,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12843044-434652,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12843044-6726009,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12843044-7620012,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/12843044-9643386
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
pubmed:issn |
0095-1137
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
41
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
3060-3
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-18
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:12843044-Antibodies, Bacterial,
pubmed-meshheading:12843044-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay,
pubmed-meshheading:12843044-Fluorescent Antibody Technique,
pubmed-meshheading:12843044-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:12843044-Immunoglobulin G,
pubmed-meshheading:12843044-Legionella pneumophila,
pubmed-meshheading:12843044-Legionnaires' Disease,
pubmed-meshheading:12843044-Reagent Kits, Diagnostic,
pubmed-meshheading:12843044-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:12843044-Sensitivity and Specificity
|
pubmed:year |
2003
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with an immunofluorescence assay for detection of Legionella pneumophila types 1 to 6.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Associated Regional and University Pathologists Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA. malanak@aruplab.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Evaluation Studies
|