Linked Life Data

12757278

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12757278

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-5-21
pubmed:abstractText
The public reporting of comparative information about health care quality is becoming an accepted way of improving accountability and quality. Quality report cards have been prominent in the United States for more than a decade and are a central feature of British health system reform. In this paper we examine the common challenges and differences in implementation of the policy in the two countries. We use this information to explore some key questions relating to the content, target audience, and use of published information. We end by making specific recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of public reporting.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0278-2715
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
22
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
134-48
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Public reporting on quality in the United States and the United Kingdom.
pubmed:affiliation
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, England.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study