Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11863160
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2002-2-26
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The hypothesis was investigated that selectively increasing the discrimination of low-frequency information (below 2600 Hz) by altering the frequency-to-electrode allocation would improve speech perception by cochlear implantees. Two experimental conditions were compared, both utilizing ten electrode positions selected based on maximal discrimination. A fixed frequency range (200-10513 Hz) was allocated either relatively evenly across the ten electrodes, or so that nine of the ten positions were allocated to the frequencies up to 2600 Hz. Two additional conditions utilizing all available electrode positions (15-18 electrodes) were assessed: one with each subject's usual frequency-to-electrode allocation; and the other using the same analysis filters as the other experimental conditions. Seven users of the Nucleus CI22 implant wore processors mapped with each experimental condition for 2-week periods away from the laboratory, followed by assessment of perception of words in quiet and sentences in noise. Performance with both ten-electrode maps was significantly poorer than with both full-electrode maps on at least one measure. Performance with the map allocating nine out of ten electrodes to low frequencies was equivalent to that with the full-electrode maps for vowel perception and sentences in noise, but was worse for consonant perception. Performance with the evenly allocated ten-electrode map was equivalent to that with the full-electrode maps for consonant perception, but worse for vowel perception and sentences in noise. Comparison of the two full-electrode maps showed that subjects could fully adapt to frequency shifts up to ratio changes of 1.3, given 2 weeks' experience. Future research is needed to investigate whether speech perception may be improved by the manipulation of frequency-to-electrode allocation in maps which have a full complement of electrodes in Nucleus implants.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
0001-4966
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
111
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1036-44
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-12-27
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:11863160-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:11863160-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:11863160-Cochlear Implantation,
pubmed-meshheading:11863160-Deafness,
pubmed-meshheading:11863160-Electrodes, Implanted,
pubmed-meshheading:11863160-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:11863160-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:11863160-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:11863160-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:11863160-Speech Discrimination Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:11863160-Speech Perception
|
pubmed:year |
2002
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Frequency-to-electrode allocation and speech perception with cochlear implants.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
The University of Melbourne, Department of Otolaryngology, Parkville, Australia. colette@unimelb.edu.au
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|