Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11098902rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031268lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11098902lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205114lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11098902lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11098902lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11098902lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032743lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11098902lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1882115lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:issue11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:dateCreated2001-2-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:abstractTextNormalization coefficients in three-dimensional positron emission tomography (3D PET) are affected by parameters such as camera geometry and the design and arrangement of the block detectors. In this work, normalization components for three whole-body 3D-capable tomographs (the GE Advance, the Siemens/CTI962/HR+ and the Siemens/CTI951R) are compared by means of a series of scans using uniform cylindrical and rotating line sources. Where applicable, the manufacturers' normalization methods are validated, and it is shown that these methods can be improved upon by using previously published normalization protocols. Those architectural differences between the three tomographs that affect normalization are discussed with a view to drawing more general conclusions about the effect of machine architecture on normalization. The data presented suggest that uniformity of system response becomes easier to achieve as the uniformity of crystal response within the detector block is improved.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:issn0031-9155lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LewellenT KTKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FerreiraN CNClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DahlbomMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MarsdenP KPKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BadawiR DRDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KohlmyerS GSGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:volume45lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:pagination3253-66lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11098902...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11098902...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11098902...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11098902...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:articleTitleA comparison of normalization effects on three whole-body cylindrical 3D PET systems.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:affiliationDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Ramsey_badawi@dfci.harvard.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11098902pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11098902lld:pubmed