Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10833710rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008059lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10833710lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0442504lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10833710lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021102lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10833710lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0180307lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10833710lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013812lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10833710lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705946lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10833710lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205171lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10833710lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1524063lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:dateCreated2000-10-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:abstractTextWhile transvenous defibrillator electrode placement avoiding a thoracotomy is preferable, electrode size, a large intercoil spacing, and the need for subclavicular device placement preclude this approach in most children. We investigated a single RV coil to an abdominally placed active can ICD device. Five children ages 8-16 years (weight 21-50 kg, mean 35 kg) underwent ICD placement. Placement of a single coil Medtronic model 6932 or 6943 electrode was performed via the left subclavian vein approach and the electrode positioned in the RV apex with the coil lying along the RV diaphragmatic surface. The ICD (Medtronic Micro Jewel II model 7223 Cx) was implanted in a left abdominal pocket with the lead tunneled from the infraclavicular region to the pocket. Implant DFTs were < or = 15 J using a biphasic waveform. DFTs rechecked within 3-month postimplant were unchanged. Lead impedance at implant ranged from 38 to 56 omega, mean 51 omega. Follow-up was 3-21 months (total 82 months) with no electrode dislodgment, lead fractures, or inappropriate discharges. Two of the five patients have had successful appropriate ICD discharges. Transvenous ICD electrode placement can be performed in children as small as 20 kg with the device implanted in a cosmetically acceptable abdominal pocket that is well tolerated. Excellent DFTs can be achieved. This approach avoids a thoracotomy in all but the smallest child, does not require subclavicular placement of the device, and avoids use of a second intravascular coil.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:issn0147-8389lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DickMM2ndlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SerwerG AGAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HayM FMFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FischbachP...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeroySSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MoscaR SRSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:volume23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:pagination884-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10833710...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:articleTitleUse of a single coil transvenous electrode with an abdominally placed implantable cardioverter defibrillator in children.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:affiliationUniversity of Michigan Congenital Heart Center, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, USA. petersf@umich.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10833710pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed