Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-5-31
pubmed:abstractText
Controversy regarding the risks and benefits of thrombolysis has not been helped by the perception that some trials were "positive" and others "negative" on their primary outcome measure of either "good" or "poor" functional outcome. We wondered whether the definition of good or poor functional outcome might have contributed to this perception, and what effect altering the definition might have on the individual trials and on the systematic review of all the trials combined.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0039-2499
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
31
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1133-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Trials of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: does the choice of primary outcome measure really matter?
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, UK. jmw@skull.dcn.ed.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Meta-Analysis