Linked Life Data

10793442

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10793442

Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10793442rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031001lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10793442lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018787lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10793442lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205409lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10793442lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10793442lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013778lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10793442lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1442080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10793442lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521828lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10793442lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0376249lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10793442lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1527180lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:issue4 Pt 1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:dateCreated2000-6-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:abstractTextThis study assessed the influence of rates of reperfusion on excitability of the myocardium using dominant frequency (DF) (in Hz) of VF and the relationship of DF to the minimum defibrillation energy (MDE) (in J). Our hypothesis was that increasing flow during reperfusion increases DF that raises MDE. Initially, six Langendorff perfused swine hearts were serially fibrillated and perfusion arrested for 4 minutes followed by reperfusion and defibrillation to establish reproducibility of the model. The epicardial ECG was analyzed for DF. In subsequent studies (n = 8), no flow VF was followed by 1-minute reperfusion at normal flow or 10% flow (low flow) and shocked with increasing energy via epicardial pads until defibrillation. The DF at onset of no flow VF was 9.5 +/- 1.4 and decreased to 3.6 +/- 1.4 after 4 minutes. Reperfusion at normal flow increased the DF of VF compared to low flow after 1 minute (10.8 +/- 1.1 vs 4.5 +/- 1.1 Hz, P = 0.0002) and was associated with increased defibrillation energy requirements (13.5 +/- 5.0 vs 7.3 +/- 6.2 J, P = 0.047). In summary, defibrillation energy requirements are lower when myocardial excitability is reduced during low flow reperfusion.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:issn0147-8389lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JohnsonT ATAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BartonC WCWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CascioW EWElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EngleC LCLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BatsonD NDNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:volume23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:pagination504-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10793442...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:articleTitleEffect of rates of perfusion on dominant frequency and defibrillation energy in isolated fibrillating hearts.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. cbarton@itsa.ucsf.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:publicationTypeIn Vitrolld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10793442pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10793442lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10793442lld:pubmed