Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-5-25
pubmed:abstractText
The validity and reliability of the SF-36 has been studied in 185 patients hospitalized with suspected ischemic cardiopathy, classified into four groups (AMI, unstable angina, nonischemic cardiologies, and absence of cardiologies). The validity of the construct has been analyzed by means of the association of the SF-36 with sociodemographic and clinical variables, and with diagnostic groups. The correlation of the subscales with GHQ-28 scores and the factorial structure have been studied. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's alpha and the item-internal consistency and item-discriminant validity. The validation result was as expected, although the scores were significantly lower in patients with unstable angina, only in the PF, VT, and GH subscales. The correlations with the GHQ-28 were high for MH and VT. The internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha 0.72-0.94). Factorial analysis identified eight factors, with the "anxiety" component of subscale MH remaining as an independent factor. These results suggest that the SF-36 is a useful scale for the differentiated clinical forms of ischemic cardiopathy, with the additional capability of reflecting the level of anxiety in these patients.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0895-4356
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
53
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
359-65
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Validity and reliability of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in patients with coronary artery disease.
pubmed:affiliation
Escuela Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Cádiz, C/Duque de Nájera 18, 11002, Cádiz, Spain. immaculada.failde@uca.es
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't