Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10490001rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10490001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034869lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10490001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015733lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10490001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0028792lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10490001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0039593lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10490001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022877lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10490001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10490001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10490001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018720lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:dateCreated1999-9-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:abstractTextScreening guidelines for colorectal cancer recommend annual fecal occult blood (FOB) testing for adults aged 50 years and older. Self-reported history of screening is frequently the sole source of data available to researchers and clinicians. This study validated FOB testing in a sample of 1,021 older women. Testing rates based on self-reported data exceeded rates based on computerized laboratory records by 13.9%. Agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.52; 95% confidence interval 0.47, 0.58). Sensitivity was 0.92 and specificity 0.58. Logistic regression analysis showed that older age and physician encouragement for FOB testing were associated with accurate recall (p<0.05). Self-report is the most commonly available information about the occurrence and timing of cancer detection procedures. These data suggest cautious use of self-reported screening by FOB for clinical decision making and for research and surveillance.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:issn0002-9262lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NadelM RMRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DeeF SFSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MandelsonM...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AndersonL ALAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LaCroixA ZAZlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:volume150lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:pagination617-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10490001...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:articleTitleComparison of self-reported fecal occult blood testing with automated laboratory records among older women in a health maintenance organization.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:affiliationCenter for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10490001pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10490001lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10490001lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10490001lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10490001lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10490001lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10490001lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10490001lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10490001lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10490001lld:pubmed