Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10335758
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
10
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1999-6-8
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Modulation of atrioventricular (AV) node conduction and radiofrequency ablation of AV junction are alternative approaches to control ventricular rate in drug refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). In 2 centers, 120 patients were treated either with AV junction ablation (center 1, group 1, 60 patients [30 men, aged 64 +/- 11 years], paroxysmal AF in 24 patients) or with modulation (group 2, 60 patients [32 men, aged 58 +/- 12 years], paroxysmal AF in 43 patients). In group 1, complete AV block was achieved in all patients. In group 2, the procedure was performed in sinus rhythm (30 patients), prolonging the Wenckebach cycle length from 328 +/- 85 to 466 +/- 80 ms (p <0.01) or during AF (30 patients), decreasing ventricular rate from 178 +/- 35 to 96 +/- 35 beats/min (p <0.01), and to <100 beats/min in 17 patients (61%). Complete AV block was induced in 9 of 60 patients (15%). In groups 1 and 2, at a follow-up of 27 +/- 7 and 26 +/- 6 months, there were 2 deaths (1 cardiac, 1 sudden death) and 1 death for end-stage heart failure, respectively. Hospital readmissions decreased from 3.2 to 0.2 and from 4.2 to 0.2/year; late AF recurrences at of >120 beats/min were documented in 6% and 12%, respectively. Symptom score analysis including effort and rest dyspnea, exercise intolerance, weakness, and palpitation showed a significant improvement in both treatment groups, when acutely effective, in patients with paroxysmal and/or chronic AF. In conclusion, ablation of the AV junction shows a higher acute success rate compared with modulation of the AV node conduction in patients with drug refractory AF. Depending on the acute success, both approaches therefore were similarly effective in achieving long-term ventricular rate control and symptom score improvement.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
May
|
pubmed:issn |
0002-9149
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
15
|
pubmed:volume |
83
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1437-42
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10335758-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:10335758-Atrial Fibrillation,
pubmed-meshheading:10335758-Atrioventricular Node,
pubmed-meshheading:10335758-Catheter Ablation,
pubmed-meshheading:10335758-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:10335758-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:10335758-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:10335758-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:10335758-Pacemaker, Artificial,
pubmed-meshheading:10335758-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:10335758-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:year |
1999
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular junction and pacemaker implantation versus modulation of atrioventricular conduction in drug refractory atrial fibrillation.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Institute of Cardiology, Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Controlled Clinical Trial,
Multicenter Study
|