Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1010864rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016452lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1010864lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0019236lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1010864lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1010864lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008562lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1010864lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1010864lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008556lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:issue12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:dateCreated1977-3-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:abstractTextA comparison of gas chromatography with electron-capture or electrolytic-conductivity (nitrogen mode) detection, and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV-absorption detection (254 nm) was carried out for the analysis of several herbicides in foods. Linuron, propanil, terbacil, benzoylprop-ethyl, and the fungicide DCNA in samples of cabbage, corn, potato, and wheat spiked at 2 and 0.2 ppm were examined. The pesticides were extracted with acetone, partitioned into petroleum ether-methylene chloride, and cleaned up on a 2% deactivated Florisil column before direct chromatographic analysis. Electron-capture gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) was most suitable for DCNA and benzoylprop-ethyl while UV-absorption HPLC was best for terbacil analysis. Linuron and propanil gave similar results for both electron-capture GLC and HPLC. Electrolytic-conductivity GLC could detect all pesticides at the 0.2 ppm level and exhibited the least number of extraneous peaks in the chromatograms.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:issn0021-9665lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LawrenceJ FJFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:volume14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:pagination557-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1010864-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1010864-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1010864-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1010864-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1010864-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1010864-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1010864-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1010864-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1010864-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:year1976lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:articleTitleA comparison of electron-capture GLC, electrolytic-conductivity GLC and UV-absorption HPLC for the analysis of some herbicides in foods.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1010864pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed